BGH, Beschluss vom 26. Juni 2025 - StB 30/25
KORE717092025This dossier retains the published metadata and every exact AI-related text passage under a stable URL.
This dossier documents official metadata and exact text passages. It is neither legal advice nor an assessment of the decision.
passage ≠ legal interpretation · document ≠ proceedingThe published identity of the document
Document number, ECLI and docket numbers remain separate fields. Missing values are not completed.
- Court
- BGH Karlsruhe
- Location
- Karlsruhe
- Judicial body
- 3. Strafsenat
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Document type
- Beschluss
- Docket number
- StB 30/25
- ECLI
- Not published
- Document number
- KORE717092025
- Decision name
- Not published
- Material fingerprint
- sha256:66e605c818abae7a0a9d157604f9024d5d0a3ff9f2dc60336b785255897840fb
Every exact text passage
A passage shows only that the documented search rule matches the published text. Read the official context before drawing a broader conclusion.
[01]Rn. 29 · randnummer-29 29 Der Einwand des Beschwerdeführers, es komme in Betracht, dass die Chatnachrichten aufgrund des Einsatzes künstlicher Intelligenz nicht authentisch seien, vermag diesen Verdacht nicht zu entkräften.…
Inspect the official source text
The official text remains authoritative. Observation times describe our retrieval, not the progress of proceedings.
- First observed
- Last observed
Included deterministically
Only published rules and exact text passages determine inclusion. The monitor creates no summary or legal-relevance assessment.
artificial-intelligence-deArtificial intelligence (German)künstliche Intelligenz · künstlicher Intelligenz · künstlichen Intelligenz
How to read this dossier.
Decision date, observation time and change time remain distinct facts. Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.
Return to the observed case-law corpus
Search every published decision, passage and observation event.