i6eal.de
DEEN
Start a project
← Back to the public AI accountability monitorSource-backed procedure dossier

Internationale Standards und Normen

Minor interpellationAnswered19 February 2025dip:vorgang:319887

This dossier documents a parliamentary procedure and its exactly published DIP relationships. It assesses neither the quality nor the effectiveness of parliamentary scrutiny.

relation = source-backed
DIP proceduredip:vorgang:319887
Election period20
exact answer pairs1
exactly linked systems0
Procedure context

What the source publishes about this procedure.

Initiative, subjects, AI terms and status come from the normalized DIP cohort. Empty fields remain empty.

Initiative

  • Fraktion der CDU/CSU

Subjects

  • Wirtschaft

observed AI terms

  • Künstliche Intelligenz

responding ministries

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
Answer state

Question and answer are evidenced separately.

Duration is calculated exclusively between the published dates of exactly linked question and answer records.

19days
Question31 January 2025dip:drucksache:278541
Answer19 February 2025dip:drucksache:278883
Original evidence

Every published identifier remains inspectable.

Documents and positions appear only with their public DIP identifier. The source link opens the corresponding original record.

DIP position

Internationale Standards und Normen

ID
dip:vorgangsposition:667308
Date
31 January 2025
Open DIP evidence ↗
DIP position

Internationale Standards und Normen

ID
dip:vorgangsposition:668414
Date
19 February 2025
Open DIP evidence ↗
Open original DIP procedure ↗
Public AI systems

No exact system link observed.

A similar name, the same ministry or a shared topic is never sufficient for a system-to-procedure link.

Method boundary

How to read this dossier.

The dossier is a deterministic projection of public DIP and Systempass data. It publishes no uncertain name links and uses no generative AI.

DIP ID = procedure · explicit relationship = answer edge

Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.

03 September 2026

Need a defensible overview for your field?

We build source-backed monitoring products with stable identifiers, visible boundaries and traceable history.

Discuss a data projectBack to the public AI accountability monitor
Related tools

Useful next steps

These tools complement the current result.

View all tools
MonitorGerman public-sector AI registerWhere does German public administration already use AI? Search published system profiles from federal, state and municipal bodies, with lifecycle, governance fields, stable identifiers and original evidence.Provenance checkPublic-sector AI system passportSee which public records can be linked to each published government AI system through stable identifiers or exact source-declared repository URLs—with a source for every edge and visible evidence boundaries.MonitorPublic AI signal chronicleSee what actually changed across public AI data: new projects, updated evidence and corrections in an append-only chronicle with observation time, source identifier and direct link.