← Back to the public AI accountability monitorSource-backed procedure dossier

Expertengespräch des Bundesverkehrsministeriums mit Vertretern des Startups Augustus Intelligence

Written questionAnswered26 June 2020dip:vorgang:264748

This dossier documents a parliamentary procedure and its exactly published DIP relationships. It assesses neither the quality nor the effectiveness of parliamentary scrutiny.

relation = source-backed

DIP proceduredip:vorgang:264748

Election period19

exact answer pairs0

exactly linked systems0

Procedure context

What the source publishes about this procedure.

Initiative, subjects, AI terms and status come from the normalized DIP cohort. Empty fields remain empty.

Initiative

Not published

Subjects

Not published

observed AI terms

Künstliche Intelligenz

responding ministries

Not published

Answer state

No separate answer record published.

A DIP procedure can be reported as answered without a separate question and answer record in this public projection. No duration is derived from that status.

Original evidence

Every published identifier remains inspectable.

Documents and positions appear only with their public DIP identifier. The source link opens the corresponding original record.

No additional document evidence is included for this procedure in the public projection.

Open original DIP procedure ↗

Public AI systems

No exact system link observed.

A similar name, the same ministry or a shared topic is never sufficient for a system-to-procedure link.

Method boundary

How to read this dossier.

The dossier is a deterministic projection of public DIP and Systempass data. It publishes no uncertain name links and uses no generative AI.

DIP ID = procedure · explicit relationship = answer edge

Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.

20 July 2026

Need a defensible overview for your field?

We build source-backed monitoring products with stable identifiers, visible boundaries and traceable history.

Discuss a data project Back to the public AI accountability monitor

Related tools

Useful next steps

These tools complement the current result.

View all tools

MonitorGerman public-sector AI registerWhere does German public administration already use AI? Search published system profiles from federal, state and municipal bodies, with lifecycle, governance fields, stable identifiers and original evidence.Provenance checkPublic-sector AI system passportSee which public records can be linked to each published government AI system through stable identifiers or exact source-declared repository URLs—with a source for every edge and visible evidence boundaries.MonitorPublic AI signal chronicleSee what actually changed across public AI data: new projects, updated evidence and corrections in an append-only chronicle with observation time, source identifier and direct link.