AI Act Art. 15Accuracy
Accuracy specifications and evaluation methods
Evaluation methods for accurate natural-language-processing systems
This dossier belongs to the selected M/613 core corpus and documents the published standardisation stage, public identifiers and original sources under a stable URL. The monitor is not a complete JTC 21 register.
No EN publication or Official Journal reference linked
A standardisation request, work item, draft, approval or even a published EN does not yet evidence a reference in the EU Official Journal. The exact citation is a condition for the presumption of conformity under Article 40.
EN published ≠ referenced in the EU Official JournalReached, announced and unpublished stages remain distinct. The path orders evidence types and is not calendar chronology: M/613 supersedes M/593, so older work items can predate the current request. Open the original evidence to inspect the metadata at its source.
No separate public evidence is linked for this stage.
The assignment is i6eal’s deterministic categorisation of public work-programme metadata, not an official CEN-CENELEC or Commission mapping. It does not state that a product or system is compliant.
AI Act Art. 15Accuracy specifications and evaluation methods
An announced date is marked as reached only after new source evidence, never merely because the date has passed.
The public dossier publishes metadata and short source descriptions only; copyrighted standards text is not reproduced in it. Private raw-source snapshots may be retained for verifiability and remain subject to the source’s terms.
CC BY 4.0 covers only i6eal’s compilation and original descriptions. Third-party metadata and private raw-source snapshots remain subject to each source’s terms; standards text is not reproduced in the public dataset.
Compare public work items by requirement field, stage and source state.
These tools complement the current result.