The Commission's continuously updated table currently lists no central contact point for Germany.
Open source evidenceAI SUPERVISION · GERMANY & EU
Who supervises the AI Act—and what supports that mandate?
The monitor connects published authorities, mandates, guidelines, codes and standardisation stages to their official evidence. It shows only what an official source supports.
- official sources only
- evidence on every edge
- changes instead of a snapshot
- no generative interpretation
Reviewed baseline · 21 July 2026Observed since · 12 July 2024
8observed supervision nodes
18official instruments
16exact evidenced relationships
3visible source notices
THE DECISIVE BOUNDARY
Responsibility is not an effectiveness verdict.
A published responsibility states who may or should act according to the source. It proves neither actual control nor compliance, sanction or success. Planned German responsibilities stay marked as planned until promulgation is officially evidenced.
mandate ≠ measure · observation ≠ legal interpretationSOURCE STATE
Where official data still shows gaps or transitions
Automation is not active in this snapshot yet
This snapshot is a reviewed baseline. The collector is prepared for 12 source endpoints; the curated corpus contains 18 official instrument sources. The collector reports availability and material changes. Legal claims, mandates and chronicle events change only after source review.
- 12
- collector endpoints
- 18
- instrument sources
- ✓
- legal claims: reviewed
The announced official list of fundamental-rights authorities is currently empty on the source page.
Open source evidenceThe Bundestag has adopted the German AI implementation bill; promulgation in the Federal Law Gazette is not yet evidenced in the observed official corpus.
Open source evidenceMANDATE CONSTELLATION
One mandate at the centre. Its evidenced routes around it.
Select a node: the constellation rearranges and shows up to eight direct, officially evidenced neighbours. Circle, square and diamond distinguish legal basis, official designation and official statement.
- Legal basis
- Official designation
- Official statement
EUEuropean Union
DEGermany
European Union
Mandate evidence
Clearly explained
Does the monitor already show fines or investigations?
Once a competent body officially publishes a measure and it can be identified exactly, it can enter as a separate evidence record. No entry does not prove that no review is taking place.
Why is the Federal Network Agency marked as “proposed”?
The Bundestag has adopted the German implementation bill, but promulgation in the Federal Law Gazette is not yet evidenced in the observed official corpus. The monitor separates parliamentary adoption from entry into force.
Is a voluntary code the same as a legal duty?
No. A code can support a compliance route; the duty comes from the AI Act. Both remain visible as separate instrument types.
Does the monitor use generative AI?
No. Retrieval, identity, fingerprints, links and changes follow published rules and official identifiers.