i6eal.de
DEEN
Start a project
PLATFORM AUTOMATION · EU

OKCupid: automation declarations in DSA data.

Using published Statements of Reasons, this monitor shows whether platform providers reported automated means in identifying specific information and in deciding whether it infringed law or platform rules. It does not show whether the restriction itself was applied automatically.

  • official EU data
  • monthly comparisons
  • platform-level dossiers
  • no AI inference
Latest source month · Last checked · Data series from ·
766published statements in the selected month
16published source months for this platform
15.9%reported with automated detection
0%reported with a fully automated decision
THE CRUCIAL BOUNDARY

Automated does not necessarily mean AI.

The DSA data reports whether detection or a decision was automated. It does not name the specific technical method or reliably establish the use of artificial intelligence. This monitor therefore describes automation declarations—not AI use, moderation quality or legal compliance.

automation declaration ≠ AI evidence · volume ≠ quality
OKCupidMay 26
Detailed combinations: latest 3 source months · full history in the open data
CO-REPORTED ATTRIBUTES

Detection, decision automation and visibility measures

Choose a platform and month. Links show attributes reported in the same aggregated Statement-of-Reasons records. They do not reconstruct a workflow, chronology or causal path. Select a link for the exact value.

non-automated detection × partially automated · 644 statements of reasonsautomated detection × partially automated · 122 statements of reasonsautomated detection × fully automated · 0 statements of reasonsautomated detection × not automated · 0 statements of reasonsnon-automated detection × fully automated · 0 statements of reasonsnon-automated detection × not automated · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × removed · 766 statements of reasonsfully automated × removed · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × access disabled · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × demoted · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × labelled · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × interaction restricted · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × age restricted · 0 statements of reasonsfully automated × other restriction · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × access disabled · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × demoted · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × labelled · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × interaction restricted · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × age restricted · 0 statements of reasonspartially automated × other restriction · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × removed · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × access disabled · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × demoted · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × labelled · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × interaction restricted · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × age restricted · 0 statements of reasonsnot automated × other restriction · 0 statements of reasonsautomated detection122non-automated detection644fully automated0partially automated766not automated0removed766access disabled0demoted0labelled0interaction restricted0age restricted0other restriction0
A · Reported automated detection
automated detection122
non-automated detection644
B · Reported automation level of the infringement decision
fully automated0
partially automated766
not automated0
C · Reported visibility restriction
removed766
access disabled0
demoted0
labelled0
interaction restricted0
age restricted0
other restriction0

non-automated detection × partially automated644100% of the relevant stage value

Links show co-reported attributes, not a workflow, chronology or causal path. The right-hand panel contains visibility measures only; account, service-provision and monetary-payment restrictions are not included. A record may report several visibility measures, so the values overlap and must not be added.

Exact values as a table
Detection × decision
Reported automated detectionfully automatedpartially automatednot automated
automated detection01220
non-automated detection06440
Decision × visibility measure
Reported automation level of the infringement decisionremovedaccess disableddemotedlabelledinteraction restrictedage restrictedother restriction
fully automated0000000
partially automated766000000
not automated0000000

Clearly explained

Does “automated” prove that a platform used AI?
No. The DSA Transparency Database contains automation declarations, but no reliable technical description of the method used. The monitor therefore deliberately refers to platform automation, not AI moderation.
Do statement counts equal the number of moderated items?
No. The unit is published statements of reasons. It is neither a reliable count of unique content nor a count of affected accounts or people.
Why can reported visibility measures add up to more than the total?
A statement can mark several visibility measures. Removal, disabling, demotion or interaction limits must therefore not be added to infer a new total.
Can I filter German platform values?
Not from this simplified monthly aggregate. It contains no territorial dimension. The monitor therefore reports EU-wide publications by platform and does not invent German subsets.
Related tools

Useful next steps

These tools complement the current result.

View all tools
MonitorEU AI transparency evidence monitorWhich public transparency evidence do AI providers publish? Inspect GPAI Code status, exact training-content summaries, and marking and labelling signals in two separate AI Act lanes—without a compliance score.MonitorAI supervision monitor Germany & EUWho supervises the AI Act and what supports that mandate? Track official authorities, mandates, guidelines, codes and changes—with evidence on every relationship.Legal trackerEU Digital Law TickerWhen do EU digital laws apply? NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, Data Act, AI Act & more, with sources, review dates and countdowns.