← Back to the AI case-law monitorPermanent official decision dossierBGH
BGH, Urteil vom 23. April 2026 - I ZR 41/24
KORE300102026This dossier retains the published metadata and every exact AI-related text passage under a stable URL.
This dossier documents official metadata and exact text passages. It is neither legal advice nor an assessment of the decision.
passage ≠ legal interpretation · document ≠ proceedingThe published identity of the document
Document number, ECLI and docket numbers remain separate fields. Missing values are not completed.
- Court
- BGH Karlsruhe
- Location
- Karlsruhe
- Judicial body
- 1. Zivilsenat
- Decision date
- 23 April 2026
- Document type
- Urteil
- Docket number
- I ZR 41/24
- ECLI
- Not published
- Document number
- KORE300102026
- Decision name
- Not published
- Material fingerprint
- sha256:18244acd0579402e2016de6e22375aef1bc5430513ab42b9e1f5a3374ffdb225
Every exact text passage
A passage shows only that the documented search rule matches the published text. Read the official context before drawing a broader conclusion.
[01]Rn. 128 · randnummer-128 …775) oder durch eine mit künstlicher Intelligenz erzeugte Stimmnachahmung (LG Berlin II, GRUR-RR 2025, 472 [juris Rn.…
Inspect the official source text
The official text remains authoritative. Observation times describe our retrieval, not the progress of proceedings.
- First observed
- Last observed
Search rules
Included deterministically
Only published rules and exact text passages determine inclusion. The monitor creates no summary or legal-relevance assessment.
artificial-intelligence-deArtificial intelligence (German)künstliche Intelligenz · künstlicher Intelligenz · künstlichen Intelligenz
Claim boundary
How to read this dossier.
Decision date, observation time and change time remain distinct facts. Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.
Return to the observed case-law corpus
Search every published decision, passage and observation event.