← Back to the AI case-law monitorPermanent official decision dossierBPAT
BPatG, Beschluss vom 30. März 2023 - 30 W (pat) 554/20
JURE239030984This dossier retains the published metadata and every exact AI-related text passage under a stable URL.
This dossier documents official metadata and exact text passages. It is neither legal advice nor an assessment of the decision.
passage ≠ legal interpretation · document ≠ proceedingThe published identity of the document
Document number, ECLI and docket numbers remain separate fields. Missing values are not completed.
- Court
- BPatG München
- Location
- München
- Judicial body
- 30. Senat
- Decision date
- 30 March 2023
- Document type
- Beschluss
- Docket number
- 30 W (pat) 554/20
- ECLI
- Not published
- Document number
- JURE239030984
- Decision name
- Not published
- Material fingerprint
- sha256:87d98fa0d9b2755b3c1fb1d645567df7d88ee332f9f4674289361b6b8eefc8e7
Every exact text passage
A passage shows only that the documented search rule matches the published text. Read the official context before drawing a broader conclusion.
[01]Rn. 38 · randnummer-38 …mit künstlicher Intelligenz - z.B.…
Inspect the official source text
The official text remains authoritative. Observation times describe our retrieval, not the progress of proceedings.
- First observed
- Last observed
Search rules
Included deterministically
Only published rules and exact text passages determine inclusion. The monitor creates no summary or legal-relevance assessment.
artificial-intelligence-deArtificial intelligence (German)künstliche Intelligenz · künstlicher Intelligenz · künstlichen Intelligenz
Claim boundary
How to read this dossier.
Decision date, observation time and change time remain distinct facts. Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.
Return to the observed case-law corpus
Search every published decision, passage and observation event.