BPatG, Beschluss vom 13. Juli 2010 - 17 W (pat) 72/06
JURE109006382This dossier retains the published metadata and every exact AI-related text passage under a stable URL.
This dossier documents official metadata and exact text passages. It is neither legal advice nor an assessment of the decision.
passage ≠ legal interpretation · document ≠ proceedingThe published identity of the document
Document number, ECLI and docket numbers remain separate fields. Missing values are not completed.
- Court
- BPatG München
- Location
- München
- Judicial body
- 17. Senat
- Decision date
- 13 July 2010
- Document type
- Beschluss
- Docket number
- 17 W (pat) 72/06
- ECLI
- Not published
- Document number
- JURE109006382
- Decision name
- Not published
- Material fingerprint
- sha256:1045e95df1ff3558436bcd001e32365fa2cd919129413bc021764bc220dd3e98
Every exact text passage
A passage shows only that the documented search rule matches the published text. Read the official context before drawing a broader conclusion.
[01]Rn. 70 · randnummer-70 …Hier ist zunächst festzustellen, dass die Anmeldung keine konkrete Lehre gibt, wie eine sinnvolle Einstellrichtung bestimmt werden kann; sie beschränkt sich allein auf die Idee und setzt voraus, dass eine AI- (Artificial Intelligence-) Software diese Information schon "irgendwie" bereitstellen können wird.
Inspect the official source text
The official text remains authoritative. Observation times describe our retrieval, not the progress of proceedings.
- First observed
- Last observed
Included deterministically
Only published rules and exact text passages determine inclusion. The monitor creates no summary or legal-relevance assessment.
artificial-intelligence-enArtificial intelligenceartificial intelligence
How to read this dossier.
Decision date, observation time and change time remain distinct facts. Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.
Return to the observed case-law corpus
Search every published decision, passage and observation event.