← Back to the AI case-law monitorPermanent official decision dossierBPAT
BPatG, Beschluss vom 29. Januar 2010 - 30 W (pat) 52/07
JURE109005011This dossier retains the published metadata and every exact AI-related text passage under a stable URL.
This dossier documents official metadata and exact text passages. It is neither legal advice nor an assessment of the decision.
passage ≠ legal interpretation · document ≠ proceedingThe published identity of the document
Document number, ECLI and docket numbers remain separate fields. Missing values are not completed.
- Court
- BPatG München
- Location
- München
- Judicial body
- 30. Senat
- Decision date
- 29 January 2010
- Document type
- Beschluss
- Docket number
- 30 W (pat) 52/07
- ECLI
- Not published
- Document number
- JURE109005011
- Decision name
- Not published
- Material fingerprint
- sha256:b9898b0e123c4ea3b74eefce16f84e1eacbc427aa8f57a428fc97d85afd2d0cd
Every exact text passage
A passage shows only that the documented search rule matches the published text. Read the official context before drawing a broader conclusion.
[01]Rn. 16 · randnummer-16 …Jahrhunderts eine technologische Entwicklung, die den Maschinen zu sogenannter „künstlicher Intelligenz“ verhalfen, die durch Computerprogramme (Software) gesteuert wird (vgl.…
Inspect the official source text
The official text remains authoritative. Observation times describe our retrieval, not the progress of proceedings.
- First observed
- Last observed
Search rules
Included deterministically
Only published rules and exact text passages determine inclusion. The monitor creates no summary or legal-relevance assessment.
artificial-intelligence-deArtificial intelligence (German)künstliche Intelligenz · künstlicher Intelligenz · künstlichen Intelligenz
Claim boundary
How to read this dossier.
Decision date, observation time and change time remain distinct facts. Not observed means neither zero nor absent in reality.
Return to the observed case-law corpus
Search every published decision, passage and observation event.