AI STANDARDISATION · GERMANY & EU
From standardisation request to Official Journal citation.
The monitor covers the AI Act standardisation request in full: of 53 projects in CEN/CENELEC JTC 21, 17 carry M/593 or M/613 in the mandate field, and 16 of those appear here with status, German participation windows, publication and the citation in the EU Official Journal. The committee's remaining 36 projects carry no mandate and do not belong here.
- official sources only
- no standards text in public data
- no generative AI
Data state 05 Sept 2026observed since 23 Jun 2025
Approved does not yet mean OJ-referenced.
A draft, an approved standard, national adoption and an EU Official Journal citation are four different facts. The exact citation is a condition for the presumption of conformity under Article 40 for the requirements it covers.
- 01Approvedtechnically agreed→
- 02EN publishedEuropean standard available→
- 03Official Journallegally relevant citationOJ GATE
CONFORMITY RUNWAY
Where every work item actually stands
Select a row. The path shows evidenced gates or announcements published by a source only; the hatched Official Journal column remains a hard boundary.
EN 18286:2026WG 2 · JT021039
- Requestevidenced · 23 Jun 2025
- Work itemevidenced · 16 Oct 2024
- Draftingevidenced
- Enquiryevidenced
- Approvalevidenced
- Approvedevidenced
- EN publishedevidenced · 22 Jul 2026
- EU Official Journalnot published
Requirement areasAI Act Art. 17Quality management
Process path, not calendar chronology: M/613 supersedes M/593. Existing work items can therefore predate the current standardisation request.
Clearly explained
Is this a complete register of every JTC 21 standards project?
Not of JTC 21, but yes of the mandate. Every one of the committee’s projects was checked and 16 of those carrying M/593 or M/613 are listed here, with any that cannot be represented named separately. Projects without a mandate are out of scope by design, so this is not a complete JTC 21 register. Requirement fields are i6eal’s deterministic categorisation of public work-programme metadata, not an official CEN-CENELEC or Commission mapping.
Does the monitor already show AI Act standards referenced in the Official Journal?
No. The reviewed corpus does not yet link a specific work item to an exact AI Act reference in the EU Official Journal. Approval or publication alone does not establish the Official Journal condition for the presumption of conformity under Article 40.
What is the current status of EN 18286?
The currently reported work-item status is “EN published”. EN publication, possible national adoption and a later EU Official Journal reference remain separate evidence gates.
Can I read the standards here?
No. Standards are copyright protected. The monitor publishes administrative metadata, independently written topic descriptions and direct links to the responsible bodies.
What is the value of the German participation window?
When DIN publishes a commenting window, its deadline and original source appear separately from the European procedure. This shows where public participation is still possible.
Does the monitor use generative AI?
No. Retrieval, identity, status logic, fingerprints and changes follow published rules and official identifiers.