Google's autocomplete reveals what people actually type — before articles exist for it. We record it daily for a fixed set of AI search stems and track the date each completion first appeared.
Completions that showed up for the first time in the last few days — the early indicator of what Germany has just started asking about AI.
From today we record daily which completions are added — the "newly appeared" list grows from tomorrow. Today you see the current snapshot.
For each search stem, the top completions from Google's German autocomplete. Entries marked new appeared today.
chatgpt …claude …gemini …copilot …perplexity …mistral …deepseek …grok …midjourney …sora …ollama …ki …künstliche intelligenz …ki tools …ki für …beste ki …ist chatgpt …kann ki …wie funktioniert ki …ist ki gefährlich…ersetzt ki …ki verboten …ki gesetz …eu ai act …ki datenschutz …ki urheberrecht …ki im unternehmen …ki beratung …ki agentur …ki automatisierung …ki weiterbildung …ki jobs …ki bild …ki video …ki musik …ki text …ki übersetzer …chatgpt alternative …ki lebenslauf …ki präsentation …Honest and reproducible — a fixed set of search stems, once a day, straight from Google's public autocomplete.
We query the same ~40 AI stems — from "chatgpt" to "ki verboten" to "ki im unternehmen". Frozen in place so the time series stays comparable.
We read Google's public autocomplete suggestions for Germany (hl=de, gl=de) — the same ones you see while typing.
A job checks the suggestions daily and remembers the date each one first appeared. That's how new questions become visible.
Google keeps no history for autocomplete, and no archive captures it. Our series can only be built forward — nobody can reconstruct it after the fact.
Autocomplete reflects real searches but is algorithmically filtered by Google (e.g. offensive or legally sensitive suggestions are suppressed). We show the suggestions unchanged and don't rate them. "New" means first seen since our recording began — not necessarily new on the web.
Straight from Google's public autocomplete for Germany — the same suggestions that appear when you type into Google Search. We query them for a fixed set of AI stems.
That a completion appeared for the first time since our daily recording began. It's an early indicator of emerging questions — it doesn't necessarily mean the term is new on the web.
Because Google provides no past data for autocomplete and no archive (not even the Wayback Machine) captures it. Anyone who starts measuring later has missed the past days forever — which is what makes the series valuable.
No. Google Trends shows search volume over time and lets you query any period. Autocomplete shows the exact phrasings people type — and stores no history. That's exactly why you have to record it yourself.
Source: Google's public autocomplete (Suggest) for Germany (hl=de, gl=de). Suggestions are algorithmically filtered by Google and shown by us unchanged and unrated. "New" = first seen since our recording began. No warranty for completeness.
We turn real search questions into content and tools that make you visible — on Google and in AI answers.